Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:32

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sint temporibus laudantium dolore id ea aliquam.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How Elon Musk Is Reinventing Tesla’s Strategy - WSJ
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Which is the best AI app for house plan making?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Librarians breathe easy as tool spots toxic book pigment - The Times
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nvidia CEO Pays Tribute To Late Nintendo President Satoru Iwata In New Switch 2 Video - Kotaku
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
12 Tips For The Alters You Need To Know Before You Play - GameSpot
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Circle’s buzzy IPO was a big hit. Now comes the hard part. - MarketWatch